Bosch WQG233D0FR or Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR: which should you choose?
Compare the two tumble dryers across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Bosch WQG233D0FR
Main drawbackCondensation tank requires regular emptying
Read the full analysis →
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Main drawbackCurrent E energy classification holds back its efficiency appeal
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority “Load capacity”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 8.6 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority “Drum volume”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 8.8 / 10 vs 7.6
- Priority “Equipment”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3
Criterion by criterion
| Criteria | Bosch WQG233D0FR | Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 7.3 | 8.6 advantage |
| Drum volume | 7.6 | 8.8 advantage |
| Equipment | 8.3 | 9.1 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Bosch WQG233D0FR | Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 8 kg | 9 kg |
| Width | 59,8 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 65,4 cm | Not provided |
| Height | 84,2 cm | Not provided |
| Noise level | 64 dB | 64 dB |
| Electrical power | 600 W | 850 W |
| Drum volume | 112 L | 120 L |
| Your search | Tumble dryers | Tumble dryers |
| Drying type | Heat pump | Heat pump |
| Energy class, A to G label | C | E |
| Energy class, old label | A+++ | A+++ |
| Installation | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Features | Delay end | Delay start |
| Programmes | Quick | Quick |
| Appliance or accessory | Tumble dryer | Tumble dryer |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, gathered in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which one is right for you?
Bosch WQG233D0FR
Ahead on 0 criterion out of 3 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Ahead on 3 criteria out of 3 compared
- Load capacity: 8.6/10 vs 7.3/10 (9 kg vs 8 kg)
- Drum volume: 8.8/10 vs 7.6/10 (120 L vs 112 L)
- Equipment: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Bosch WQG233D0FR or Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR scores 8.8/10, compared with 7.7/10 for Bosch WQG233D0FR, using the same scoring criteria.
Which comes out ahead for “Load capacity”?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Load capacity”: 8.6/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Bosch WQG233D0FR. Recorded values: 9 kg versus 8 kg.
Which comes out ahead for “Drum volume”?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Drum volume”: 8.8/10 compared with 7.6/10 for Bosch WQG233D0FR. Recorded values: 120 L versus 112 L.
Which comes out ahead for “Equipment”?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Equipment”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Bosch WQG233D0FR.