Electrolux EDHF4812AC or Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S: which should you choose?
Compare the two tumble dryers across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Electrolux EDHF4812AC
Main drawbackEnergy class E on the A to G scale is our main reservation
Read the full analysis →
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S
Main drawbackEnergy rating E on the current A to G scale
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority “Load capacity”Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S 9.5 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority “Drum volume”Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S 9.3 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority “Equipment”Electrolux EDHF4812AC 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3
Criterion by criterion
| Criteria | Electrolux EDHF4812AC | Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 7.3 | 9.5 advantage |
| Drum volume | 8.2 | 9.3 advantage |
| Equipment | 9.1 advantage | 8.3 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Electrolux EDHF4812AC | Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 8 kg | 11 kg |
| Width | 59,6 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Depth | Not provided | 60,7 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | 85 cm |
| Noise level | 66 dB | 66 dB |
| Electrical power | 800 W | Not provided |
| Drum volume | 118 L | 125 L |
| Your search | Tumble dryers | Tumble dryers |
| Drying type | Condenser and heat pump | Heat pump |
| Energy class, A to G label | E | E |
| Installation | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Features | Delay start | Delay start |
| Programmes | Wool | Quick |
| Appliance or accessory | Tumble dryer | Tumble dryer |
| Condensation efficiency class on the current label | D | C |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, gathered in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which one is right for you?
Electrolux EDHF4812AC
Ahead on 1 criterion out of 3 compared
- Equipment: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10
- Drying type: Condenser and heat pump
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S
Ahead on 2 criteria out of 3 compared
- Load capacity: 9.5/10 vs 7.3/10 (11 kg vs 8 kg)
- Drum volume: 9.3/10 vs 8.2/10 (125 L vs 118 L)
- Drying type: Heat pump
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Electrolux EDHF4812AC or Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S?
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S scores 9/10, compared with 8.2/10 for Electrolux EDHF4812AC, using the same scoring criteria.
Which comes out ahead for “Load capacity”?
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S comes out ahead for “Load capacity”: 9.5/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Electrolux EDHF4812AC. Recorded values: 11 kg versus 8 kg.
Which comes out ahead for “Drum volume”?
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S comes out ahead for “Drum volume”: 9.3/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Electrolux EDHF4812AC. Recorded values: 125 L versus 118 L.
Which comes out ahead for “Equipment”?
Electrolux EDHF4812AC comes out ahead for “Equipment”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S.
How do the two differ in drying type?
Electrolux EDHF4812AC: Condenser and heat pump. Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S: Heat pump.