Head to head

Miele TSD 643 WP or Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S: which should you choose?

Compare the two tumble dryers across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Miele TSD 643 WP, studio product shot

Miele TSD 643 WP

8.8/10
Overall score

Main drawbackAverage sound output restricts placement beside living areas

Read the full analysis →
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S, studio product shot

Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S

9/10
Overall score

Main drawbackEnergy rating E on the current A to G scale

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority “Load capacity”Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S 9.5 / 10 vs 8.6
  • Priority “Drum volume”Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S 9.3 / 10 vs 8.8
  • Priority “Equipment”Miele TSD 643 WP 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3

Criterion by criterion

Criterion-by-criterion comparison of Miele TSD 643 WP and Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S
Criteria Miele TSD 643 WP Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S
Load capacity 8.6 9.5 advantage
Drum volume 8.8 9.3 advantage
Equipment 9.1 advantage 8.3

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Miele TSD 643 WP and Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S
SpecificationMiele TSD 643 WPCandy CSOE H11A2TE-S
Load capacity9 kg11 kg
Width59,6 cm59,6 cm
Depth64,3 cm60,7 cm
Height85 cm85 cm
Noise level64 dB66 dB
Electrical power1100 WNot provided
Drum volume120 L125 L
Your searchTumble dryersTumble dryers
Drying typeHeat pumpHeat pump
Energy class, A to G labelCE
InstallationBuilt-inFreestanding
ColourWhiteWhite
FeaturesDelay startDelay start
ProgrammesQuickQuick
Appliance or accessoryTumble dryerTumble dryer

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, gathered in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which one is right for you?

Miele TSD 643 WP

Ahead on 1 criterion out of 3 compared

  • Equipment: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10
View Miele TSD 643 WP →

Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S

Ahead on 2 criteria out of 3 compared

  • Load capacity: 9.5/10 vs 8.6/10 (11 kg vs 9 kg)
  • Drum volume: 9.3/10 vs 8.8/10 (125 L vs 120 L)
View Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S →

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher, Miele TSD 643 WP or Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S?

They're neck and neck: 8.8/10 for Miele TSD 643 WP, 9/10 for Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S. A gap of less than half a point isn't counted as an advantage.

Which comes out ahead for “Load capacity”?

Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S comes out ahead for “Load capacity”: 9.5/10 compared with 8.6/10 for Miele TSD 643 WP. Recorded values: 11 kg versus 9 kg.

Which comes out ahead for “Equipment”?

Miele TSD 643 WP comes out ahead for “Equipment”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S.

Which comes out ahead for “Drum volume”?

Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S comes out ahead for “Drum volume”: 9.3/10 compared with 8.8/10 for Miele TSD 643 WP. Recorded values: 125 L versus 120 L.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it