Head to head

Siemens WQ45G2A0FF or Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR: which should you choose?

Compare the two tumble dryers across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Siemens WQ45G2A0FF, studio product shot

Siemens WQ45G2A0FF

8.4/10
Overall score

Main drawbackEnergy class E is the biggest drawback

Read the full analysis →
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR, studio product shot

Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR

8.8/10
Overall score

Main drawbackCurrent E energy classification holds back its efficiency appeal

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority “Drum volume”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 8.8 / 10 vs 7.6

Criterion by criterion

Criterion-by-criterion comparison of Siemens WQ45G2A0FF and Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Criteria Siemens WQ45G2A0FF Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Load capacity 8.6 8.6
Drum volume 7.6 8.8 advantage
Equipment 9.1 9.1

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Siemens WQ45G2A0FF and Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
SpecificationSiemens WQ45G2A0FFWhirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Load capacity9 kg9 kg
Width59,8 cmNot provided
Depth64,8 cmNot provided
Height84,2 cmNot provided
Noise level64 dB64 dB
Electrical power800 W850 W
Drum volume112 L120 L
Your searchTumble dryersTumble dryers
Drying typeHeat pumpHeat pump
Energy class, A to G labelEE
InstallationFreestandingFreestanding
FeaturesAutomatic drying controlDelay start
ProgrammesQuickQuick
Appliance or accessoryTumble dryerTumble dryer
Condensation water drainageTank to emptyTank to empty

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, gathered in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which one is right for you?

Siemens WQ45G2A0FF

Ahead on 0 criterion out of 3 compared

  • No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
View Siemens WQ45G2A0FF →

Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR

Ahead on 1 criterion out of 3 compared

  • Drum volume: 8.8/10 vs 7.6/10 (120 L vs 112 L)
View Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR →

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher, Siemens WQ45G2A0FF or Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR?

They're neck and neck: 8.4/10 for Siemens WQ45G2A0FF, 8.8/10 for Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR. A gap of less than half a point isn't counted as an advantage.

Which comes out ahead for “Drum volume”?

Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Drum volume”: 8.8/10 compared with 7.6/10 for Siemens WQ45G2A0FF. Recorded values: 120 L versus 112 L.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it