Head to head

Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 or Candy BR 10N2BX-S: which should you choose?

Compare the two tumble dryers across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47, studio product shot

Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47

8.3/10
Overall score

Main drawbackClass E on the current energy label limits its efficiency appeal

Read the full analysis →
Candy BR 10N2BX-S, studio product shot

Candy BR 10N2BX-S

8/10
Overall score

Main drawbackD energy rating on the current A to G scale

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority “Load capacity”Candy BR 10N2BX-S 9.3 / 10 vs 7.3
  • Priority “Drum volume”Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 9.3 / 10 vs 7.2
  • Priority “Equipment”Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 8.3 / 10 vs 7.5

Criterion by criterion

Criterion-by-criterion comparison of Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 and Candy BR 10N2BX-S
Criteria Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 Candy BR 10N2BX-S
Load capacity 7.3 9.3 advantage
Drum volume 9.3 advantage 7.2
Equipment 8.3 advantage 7.5

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 and Candy BR 10N2BX-S
SpecificationCandy CSOE H8A2DE-47Candy BR 10N2BX-S
Load capacity8 kg10 kg
Width59,6 cm59,5 cm
Depth60,7 cmNot provided
Height85 cm85 cm
Noise level67 dB62 dB
Drum volume125 L111 L
Your searchTumble dryersTumble dryers
Drying typeHeat pumpHeat pump
Energy class, A to G labelED
InstallationFreestandingFreestanding
ColourWhiteWhite
FeaturesDelay startDelay end
ProgrammesQuickDelicates
Appliance or accessoryTumble dryerTumble dryer

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, gathered in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which one is right for you?

Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47

Ahead on 2 criteria out of 3 compared

  • Drum volume: 9.3/10 vs 7.2/10 (125 L vs 111 L)
  • Equipment: 8.3/10 vs 7.5/10
View Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 →

Candy BR 10N2BX-S

Ahead on 1 criterion out of 3 compared

  • Load capacity: 9.3/10 vs 7.3/10 (10 kg vs 8 kg)
View Candy BR 10N2BX-S →

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher, Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 or Candy BR 10N2BX-S?

They're neck and neck: 8.3/10 for Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47, 8/10 for Candy BR 10N2BX-S. A gap of less than half a point isn't counted as an advantage.

Which comes out ahead for “Drum volume”?

Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 comes out ahead for “Drum volume”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.2/10 for Candy BR 10N2BX-S. Recorded values: 125 L versus 111 L.

Which comes out ahead for “Load capacity”?

Candy BR 10N2BX-S comes out ahead for “Load capacity”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47. Recorded values: 10 kg versus 8 kg.

Which comes out ahead for “Equipment”?

Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 comes out ahead for “Equipment”: 8.3/10 compared with 7.5/10 for Candy BR 10N2BX-S.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it