Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 or Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR: which should you choose?
Compare the two tumble dryers across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47
Main drawbackClass E on the current energy label limits its efficiency appeal
Read the full analysis →
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Main drawbackCurrent E energy classification holds back its efficiency appeal
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority “Load capacity”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 8.6 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority “Drum volume”Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 9.3 / 10 vs 8.8
- Priority “Equipment”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3
Criterion by criterion
| Criteria | Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 | Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 7.3 | 8.6 advantage |
| Drum volume | 9.3 advantage | 8.8 |
| Equipment | 8.3 | 9.1 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 | Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 8 kg | 9 kg |
| Width | 59,6 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 60,7 cm | Not provided |
| Height | 85 cm | Not provided |
| Noise level | 67 dB | 64 dB |
| Electrical power | Not provided | 850 W |
| Drum volume | 125 L | 120 L |
| Your search | Tumble dryers | Tumble dryers |
| Drying type | Heat pump | Heat pump |
| Energy class, A to G label | E | E |
| Energy class, old label | A+++ | A+++ |
| Installation | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Features | Delay start | Delay start |
| Programmes | Quick | Quick |
| Appliance or accessory | Tumble dryer | Tumble dryer |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, gathered in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which one is right for you?
Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47
Ahead on 1 criterion out of 3 compared
- Drum volume: 9.3/10 vs 8.8/10 (125 L vs 120 L)
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Ahead on 2 criteria out of 3 compared
- Load capacity: 8.6/10 vs 7.3/10 (9 kg vs 8 kg)
- Equipment: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 or Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR scores 8.8/10, compared with 8.3/10 for Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47, using the same scoring criteria.
Which comes out ahead for “Load capacity”?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Load capacity”: 8.6/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47. Recorded values: 9 kg versus 8 kg.
Which comes out ahead for “Equipment”?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Equipment”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47.
Which comes out ahead for “Drum volume”?
Candy CSOE H8A2DE-47 comes out ahead for “Drum volume”: 9.3/10 compared with 8.8/10 for Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR. Recorded values: 125 L versus 120 L.