Head to head

Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR or Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S: which should you choose?

Compare the two tumble dryers across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR, studio product shot

Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR

8.6/10
Overall score

Main drawbackCondensation tank needs emptying whenever it is full

Read the full analysis →
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S, studio product shot

Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S

9/10
Overall score

Main drawbackEnergy rating E on the current A to G scale

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority “Load capacity”Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S 9.5 / 10 vs 7.3
  • Priority “Equipment”Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3

Criterion by criterion

Criterion-by-criterion comparison of Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR and Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S
Criteria Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S
Load capacity 7.3 9.5 advantage
Drum volume 9.5 9.3
Equipment 9.1 advantage 8.3

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR and Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S
SpecificationWhirlpool CWD86MWBRFRCandy CSOE H11A2TE-S
Load capacity8 kg11 kg
Width59,8 cm59,6 cm
DepthNot provided60,7 cm
Height84,6 cm85 cm
Noise level60 dB66 dB
Electrical power600 WNot provided
Drum volume127 L125 L
Your searchTumble dryersTumble dryers
Drying typeHeat pumpHeat pump
Energy class, A to G labelAE
InstallationFreestandingFreestanding
ColourWhiteWhite
FeaturesDelay endDelay start
ProgrammesQuickQuick
Appliance or accessoryTumble dryerTumble dryer

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, gathered in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which one is right for you?

Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR

Tied, ahead on 1 of the 3 criteria compared

  • Equipment: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10
View Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR →

Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S

Tied, ahead on 1 of the 3 criteria compared

  • Load capacity: 9.5/10 vs 7.3/10 (11 kg vs 8 kg)
View Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S →

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher, Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR or Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S?

They're neck and neck: 8.6/10 for Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR, 9/10 for Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S. A gap of less than half a point isn't counted as an advantage.

Which comes out ahead for “Load capacity”?

Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S comes out ahead for “Load capacity”: 9.5/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR. Recorded values: 11 kg versus 8 kg.

Which comes out ahead for “Equipment”?

Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR comes out ahead for “Equipment”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it