Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR or Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR: which should you choose?
Compare the two tumble dryers across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR
Main drawbackCondensation tank needs emptying whenever it is full
Read the full analysis →
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Main drawbackCurrent E energy classification holds back its efficiency appeal
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority “Load capacity”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 8.6 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority “Drum volume”Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR 9.5 / 10 vs 8.8
Criterion by criterion
| Criteria | Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR | Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 7.3 | 8.6 advantage |
| Drum volume | 9.5 advantage | 8.8 |
| Equipment | 9.1 | 9.1 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR | Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 8 kg | 9 kg |
| Width | 59,8 cm | Not provided |
| Height | 84,6 cm | Not provided |
| Noise level | 60 dB | 64 dB |
| Electrical power | 600 W | 850 W |
| Drum volume | 127 L | 120 L |
| Your search | Tumble dryers | Tumble dryers |
| Drying type | Heat pump | Heat pump |
| Energy class, A to G label | A | E |
| Loading type | Front loading (porthole door) | Front loading (porthole door) |
| Installation | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Features | Delay end | Delay start |
| Programmes | Quick | Quick |
| Appliance or accessory | Tumble dryer | Tumble dryer |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, gathered in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which one is right for you?
Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR
Tied, ahead on 1 of the 3 criteria compared
- Drum volume: 9.5/10 vs 8.8/10 (127 L vs 120 L)
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Tied, ahead on 1 of the 3 criteria compared
- Load capacity: 8.6/10 vs 7.3/10 (9 kg vs 8 kg)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR or Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR?
They're neck and neck: 8.6/10 for Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR, 8.8/10 for Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR. A gap of less than half a point isn't counted as an advantage.
Which comes out ahead for “Load capacity”?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Load capacity”: 8.6/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR. Recorded values: 9 kg versus 8 kg.
Which comes out ahead for “Drum volume”?
Whirlpool CWD86MWBRFR comes out ahead for “Drum volume”: 9.5/10 compared with 8.8/10 for Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR. Recorded values: 127 L versus 120 L.