Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR or Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S: which should you choose?
Compare the two tumble dryers across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Main drawbackCurrent E energy classification holds back its efficiency appeal
Read the full analysis →
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S
Main drawbackEnergy rating E on the current A to G scale
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority “Load capacity”Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S 9.5 / 10 vs 8.6
- Priority “Drum volume”Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S 9.3 / 10 vs 8.8
- Priority “Equipment”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3
Criterion by criterion
| Criteria | Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR | Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 8.6 | 9.5 advantage |
| Drum volume | 8.8 | 9.3 advantage |
| Equipment | 9.1 advantage | 8.3 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR | Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 9 kg | 11 kg |
| Width | Not provided | 59,6 cm |
| Depth | Not provided | 60,7 cm |
| Height | Not provided | 85 cm |
| Noise level | 64 dB | 66 dB |
| Electrical power | 850 W | Not provided |
| Drum volume | 120 L | 125 L |
| Your search | Tumble dryers | Tumble dryers |
| Drying type | Heat pump | Heat pump |
| Energy class, A to G label | E | E |
| Installation | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Features | Delay start | Delay start |
| Programmes | Quick | Quick |
| Appliance or accessory | Tumble dryer | Tumble dryer |
| Condensation water drainage | Tank to empty | Tank to empty |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, gathered in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which one is right for you?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Ahead on 1 criterion out of 3 compared
- Equipment: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S
Ahead on 2 criteria out of 3 compared
- Load capacity: 9.5/10 vs 8.6/10 (11 kg vs 9 kg)
- Drum volume: 9.3/10 vs 8.8/10 (125 L vs 120 L)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR or Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S?
They're neck and neck: 8.8/10 for Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR, 9/10 for Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S. A gap of less than half a point isn't counted as an advantage.
Which comes out ahead for “Load capacity”?
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S comes out ahead for “Load capacity”: 9.5/10 compared with 8.6/10 for Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR. Recorded values: 11 kg versus 9 kg.
Which comes out ahead for “Equipment”?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Equipment”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S.
Which comes out ahead for “Drum volume”?
Candy CSOE H11A2TE-S comes out ahead for “Drum volume”: 9.3/10 compared with 8.8/10 for Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR. Recorded values: 125 L versus 120 L.