Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR or Beko D3H28493W: which should you choose?
Compare the two tumble dryers across our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Main drawbackCurrent E energy classification holds back its efficiency appeal
Read the full analysis →
Beko D3H28493W
Main drawbackEnergy class C is less favorable than A and B
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority “Load capacity”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 8.6 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority “Drum volume”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 8.8 / 10 vs 7.1
- Priority “Equipment”Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR 9.1 / 10 vs 7.5
Criterion by criterion
| Criteria | Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR | Beko D3H28493W |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 8.6 advantage | 7.3 |
| Drum volume | 8.8 advantage | 7.1 |
| Equipment | 9.1 advantage | 7.5 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply more precision than we can offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR | Beko D3H28493W |
|---|---|---|
| Load capacity | 9 kg | 8 kg |
| Width | Not provided | 59,8 cm |
| Height | Not provided | 84,6 cm |
| Noise level | 64 dB | Not provided |
| Electrical power | 850 W | 800 W |
| Drum volume | 120 L | 110 L |
| Your search | Tumble dryers | Tumble dryers |
| Drying type | Heat pump | Heat pump |
| Energy class, A to G label | E | C |
| Features | Delay start | Delay end |
| Programmes | Quick | Wool |
| Appliance or accessory | Tumble dryer | Tumble dryer |
| Condensation water drainage | Tank to empty | Direct connection to a water drain |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, gathered in our analyses. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which one is right for you?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR
Ahead on 3 criteria out of 3 compared
- Drum volume: 8.8/10 vs 7.1/10 (120 L vs 110 L)
- Equipment: 9.1/10 vs 7.5/10
- Load capacity: 8.6/10 vs 7.3/10 (9 kg vs 8 kg)
Beko D3H28493W
Ahead on 0 criterion out of 3 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our approach →
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher, Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR or Beko D3H28493W?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR scores 8.8/10, compared with 7.3/10 for Beko D3H28493W, using the same scoring criteria.
Which comes out ahead for “Drum volume”?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Drum volume”: 8.8/10 compared with 7.1/10 for Beko D3H28493W. Recorded values: 120 L versus 110 L.
Which comes out ahead for “Equipment”?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Equipment”: 9.1/10 compared with 7.5/10 for Beko D3H28493W.
Which comes out ahead for “Load capacity”?
Whirlpool FFTDNM229X2BSFR comes out ahead for “Load capacity”: 8.6/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Beko D3H28493W. Recorded values: 9 kg versus 8 kg.